|
Saturday, July 2, 2011
Charley Reese's Final column!
I copied this from my private email and thought it was worth sharing. Hope you think so also.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Whose Rights Are Right?
Every now and then something comes across my path that provokes deep emotions of disappointment and sadness. I was raised to respect the rights of others, to conduct my own actions and related words on a manner that allows my neighbor, whether I know them or not, whether I like them or not, to enjoy his or her human rights that are guaranteed by our Bill of Rights. In other words, I believe that my rights end when I intentionally infringe on the rights of someone else.
This morning I was watching a video which was posted to my Facebook page. I listened with interest as this individual described how he and his wife and daughter were verbally attacked as they watched an Alfred Hitchcock movie which was shown out-of-doors in Bryant Park, NYC. The treatment they received was deplorable, and I admire them for not retaliating, even when the man's wife had a glass of wine kicked at her back, forcing her to sit on a wet blanket on the ground in a wet blouse and slacks that reeked of alcohol.
In spite of this treatment, the three-some sat quietly and watched the movie in its entirety over the din of hecklers who spewed hate and diversity accusations in their direction.
After I watched the video and considered using it as the basis for my blog, I was reminded of a movie that taught me a lot about acceptance of people, "A Reason to Kill". In what was a truly emotional closing speech made by the defendant of a murder trial, the defense attorney asked the jury to close their eyes and visualize as he described the torture a young girl went through, the daughter of the defendant, as she was gang-raped by young men in the southern town she and her family lived in.
At the very end of his closing comments, the attorney asked the jurors to put themselves in the place of the young girl...then, he asked them to imagine that this young victim was white. There was almost an audible gasp in the courtroom. Why? Those who have watched the movie will know why! The young girl was black and her attackers were white. The father, who in a fit of rage over the personal violation of his daughter, was on trial for killing the young men as they were being escorted to the courthouse for arraignment, also wounding the deputy who said under oath that he didn't hold no bad feelings against the defendant. The father was found not guilty.
It doesn't matter who the man in the video I watched this morning was...he and his family was exercising their right to enjoy an evening in the park park, the same right each and every other person there was enjoying. Please, watch this video with an open heart! Put yourself in his place, your family on that blanket, eagerly waiting to watch a movie by a favorite screenwriter.
Then, ask yourself after you've reached the end: "How would I like to be treated as he and his family were treated? "How would I have reacted under the same circumstances?" and "What gives citizens of this country of inalienable rights the right to infringe on the rights of another?"
What are your answers?
American Family Attacked in Bryant Park, NYC
This morning I was watching a video which was posted to my Facebook page. I listened with interest as this individual described how he and his wife and daughter were verbally attacked as they watched an Alfred Hitchcock movie which was shown out-of-doors in Bryant Park, NYC. The treatment they received was deplorable, and I admire them for not retaliating, even when the man's wife had a glass of wine kicked at her back, forcing her to sit on a wet blanket on the ground in a wet blouse and slacks that reeked of alcohol.
In spite of this treatment, the three-some sat quietly and watched the movie in its entirety over the din of hecklers who spewed hate and diversity accusations in their direction.
After I watched the video and considered using it as the basis for my blog, I was reminded of a movie that taught me a lot about acceptance of people, "A Reason to Kill". In what was a truly emotional closing speech made by the defendant of a murder trial, the defense attorney asked the jury to close their eyes and visualize as he described the torture a young girl went through, the daughter of the defendant, as she was gang-raped by young men in the southern town she and her family lived in.
At the very end of his closing comments, the attorney asked the jurors to put themselves in the place of the young girl...then, he asked them to imagine that this young victim was white. There was almost an audible gasp in the courtroom. Why? Those who have watched the movie will know why! The young girl was black and her attackers were white. The father, who in a fit of rage over the personal violation of his daughter, was on trial for killing the young men as they were being escorted to the courthouse for arraignment, also wounding the deputy who said under oath that he didn't hold no bad feelings against the defendant. The father was found not guilty.
It doesn't matter who the man in the video I watched this morning was...he and his family was exercising their right to enjoy an evening in the park park, the same right each and every other person there was enjoying. Please, watch this video with an open heart! Put yourself in his place, your family on that blanket, eagerly waiting to watch a movie by a favorite screenwriter.
Then, ask yourself after you've reached the end: "How would I like to be treated as he and his family were treated? "How would I have reacted under the same circumstances?" and "What gives citizens of this country of inalienable rights the right to infringe on the rights of another?"
What are your answers?
American Family Attacked in Bryant Park, NYC
Thursday, June 23, 2011
It Makes me so mad....
I sit here and ponder the madness that surrounds the present debates about "to raise, or not to raise the debt ceiling", and I know that there is so much "pork-barrel" spending, so much unnecessary spending in the White House (all in the name of protocol or keeping up appearances), or so much administrative (or now campaign?) travel and related expenses that could be eliminated. So many expenditures that are unnecessary, and yet our own president isn't willing to let go of these "extras" to save the economy of our country.
He, who never served in the military, would let our service men and women, whom he plays around the world like so many chess pieces at his own whim, would see the military budget be cut before cutting back on the astronomical size if his and his wife's "personal" staff.
Our own Congress has pension and health benefits that will keep them healthy and fat the rest of their lives, although many of them are millionaires in their own right. All this, and all they have to do is serve one term - yes, that's right just four years (the president only served a year and a half in congress) - and they get to have the brass ring HANDED to them. And, although I don't know what their going yearly salary is for members of each house, but I'm certain that with all the fringe benefits, they're making out quite well while they work.
The federal government is top-heavy with administrators, czars (and their staff), and various and sundry other private sector workers while national forests, parks and landmarks are having to let go of staff and/or face closing because their budgets are being whittled away. Yes, our children and grandchildren may not be able to experience these historic or natural prizes because the federal government doesn't feel keeping them staffed or open a necessary element of life. If I had the financial ability, I'd rather take my grandchildren to one of these natural or historic wonders than to any one of the overrated theme parks with their bright lights, exorbitant prices and crowded play yards.
Meanwhile, public sector jobs are disappearing before our eyes because of an economy which is bad, to say the least, but made even more unstable by the outrageous impact of Obamacare...you remember, the bill passed over a year ago?...the one that the then Speaker of the House told us (in one of her brighter moments) that we had to pass to find out what was in it?
Guess what?
We're finding out what's in it and even the some of the Democrats who voted in favor of the monstrosity do not like what they're finding out. It's so impractical, not to mention fiscally irresponsible, that big industries (I mean the really big ones) are asking for waivers because they can't afford the new requirements. Companies like McDonalds would rather pay the fines than provide insurance for workers who have to have a full-time position before they qualify.
And...while I'm on a role...if the mandatory "Ponzi Scheme" called Social Security is cut back (or even worse) cut, there will be millions of people without any income. What will they do? Fill the State rolls of no-income residents?
Imagine it!!
Millions of senior and disabled Americans citizens (that's spelled l-e-g-a-l) kicked out of their houses, apartments, assisted living centers, nursing homes, or adult foster-care facilities clogging the streets of our once prosperous country because they no longer have their measly, but necessary, government income. As I pointed out before, and I know has been highlighted by others, when it comes to entitlements (a word which is now spit-out like so much verbal ca-ca), we had no choice. The money was removed from our income, before we were ever issued our net income checks, without our say-so...except for federal employees who have their own pension plan which is paid for by the tax-payers, many of whom are facing untold of fates, some already, because there has been no CLR increase in two years.
Others, like myself, live in dread because we don't know if our already scant incomes might be cut even more. I recently checked into government-subsidized housing which I'll qualify for when I turn 62, roughly six months from now. I cannot live on the SSD I receive now and stay in in the apartment I live in now. I've heard members of congress, political analysts, or talk show hosts pontificating on the irresponsibility of citizens who planned on living on SS when they reached retirement age. Let me tell you something, big-mouth, arrogant, mouthpieces:
I never "planned" to live on SS. I had no choice but to file for SSD due to back problems that still are not corrected with two past surgeries and at least one looming in the future. I worked, sometimes jobs of men, to make a living so I could be a good citizen and pay my taxes. That's why my back, and other parts not necessarily the attacked by the aging process, are in the shape they're in. I could hold down a part-time job, but I can't guarantee I'd be able to work every day because my shattered nerves often keep me bedridden for one or two days at a time. So, who would hire me?
My parents planned for their retirement. Dad passed 6 1/2 years ago, but three years ago my mother found that their 401k plan was penniless and the investments from selling their house before moving into an apartment were slowly loosing their value. Although these investments are doing better, my mom is certainly not convinced that her own carefully planned and saved for retirement will be the golden years she had looked forward to. My mother is just one of millions who have had to pack-up their dreams of travel and comfort because their nest-egg has been shattered and Humpty Dumpty cannot be put back together again.
It makes me so mad I just might swear, so I'll get off the soap box and say thank you!
He, who never served in the military, would let our service men and women, whom he plays around the world like so many chess pieces at his own whim, would see the military budget be cut before cutting back on the astronomical size if his and his wife's "personal" staff.
Our own Congress has pension and health benefits that will keep them healthy and fat the rest of their lives, although many of them are millionaires in their own right. All this, and all they have to do is serve one term - yes, that's right just four years (the president only served a year and a half in congress) - and they get to have the brass ring HANDED to them. And, although I don't know what their going yearly salary is for members of each house, but I'm certain that with all the fringe benefits, they're making out quite well while they work.
The federal government is top-heavy with administrators, czars (and their staff), and various and sundry other private sector workers while national forests, parks and landmarks are having to let go of staff and/or face closing because their budgets are being whittled away. Yes, our children and grandchildren may not be able to experience these historic or natural prizes because the federal government doesn't feel keeping them staffed or open a necessary element of life. If I had the financial ability, I'd rather take my grandchildren to one of these natural or historic wonders than to any one of the overrated theme parks with their bright lights, exorbitant prices and crowded play yards.
Meanwhile, public sector jobs are disappearing before our eyes because of an economy which is bad, to say the least, but made even more unstable by the outrageous impact of Obamacare...you remember, the bill passed over a year ago?...the one that the then Speaker of the House told us (in one of her brighter moments) that we had to pass to find out what was in it?
Guess what?
We're finding out what's in it and even the some of the Democrats who voted in favor of the monstrosity do not like what they're finding out. It's so impractical, not to mention fiscally irresponsible, that big industries (I mean the really big ones) are asking for waivers because they can't afford the new requirements. Companies like McDonalds would rather pay the fines than provide insurance for workers who have to have a full-time position before they qualify.
And...while I'm on a role...if the mandatory "Ponzi Scheme" called Social Security is cut back (or even worse) cut, there will be millions of people without any income. What will they do? Fill the State rolls of no-income residents?
Imagine it!!
Millions of senior and disabled Americans citizens (that's spelled l-e-g-a-l) kicked out of their houses, apartments, assisted living centers, nursing homes, or adult foster-care facilities clogging the streets of our once prosperous country because they no longer have their measly, but necessary, government income. As I pointed out before, and I know has been highlighted by others, when it comes to entitlements (a word which is now spit-out like so much verbal ca-ca), we had no choice. The money was removed from our income, before we were ever issued our net income checks, without our say-so...except for federal employees who have their own pension plan which is paid for by the tax-payers, many of whom are facing untold of fates, some already, because there has been no CLR increase in two years.
Others, like myself, live in dread because we don't know if our already scant incomes might be cut even more. I recently checked into government-subsidized housing which I'll qualify for when I turn 62, roughly six months from now. I cannot live on the SSD I receive now and stay in in the apartment I live in now. I've heard members of congress, political analysts, or talk show hosts pontificating on the irresponsibility of citizens who planned on living on SS when they reached retirement age. Let me tell you something, big-mouth, arrogant, mouthpieces:
I never "planned" to live on SS. I had no choice but to file for SSD due to back problems that still are not corrected with two past surgeries and at least one looming in the future. I worked, sometimes jobs of men, to make a living so I could be a good citizen and pay my taxes. That's why my back, and other parts not necessarily the attacked by the aging process, are in the shape they're in. I could hold down a part-time job, but I can't guarantee I'd be able to work every day because my shattered nerves often keep me bedridden for one or two days at a time. So, who would hire me?
My parents planned for their retirement. Dad passed 6 1/2 years ago, but three years ago my mother found that their 401k plan was penniless and the investments from selling their house before moving into an apartment were slowly loosing their value. Although these investments are doing better, my mom is certainly not convinced that her own carefully planned and saved for retirement will be the golden years she had looked forward to. My mother is just one of millions who have had to pack-up their dreams of travel and comfort because their nest-egg has been shattered and Humpty Dumpty cannot be put back together again.
It makes me so mad I just might swear, so I'll get off the soap box and say thank you!
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Sad, Isn't It?
This came through my private inbox, I'm sharing it because I agree with what has been written!
Entitlement my ass , I paid cash for my social security insurance!!!! Just because they borrowed the money , doesn't make my benefits some kind of charity or handout !! Congressional benefits , aka. free healthcare , outrageous retirement packages , 67 paid holidays , three weeks paid vacation , unlimited paid sick days , now that's welfare , and they have the nerve to call my retirement entitlements !!!!!!.....scroll down...............
Entitlement my ass , I paid cash for my social security insurance!!!! Just because they borrowed the money , doesn't make my benefits some kind of charity or handout !! Congressional benefits , aka. free healthcare , outrageous retirement packages , 67 paid holidays , three weeks paid vacation , unlimited paid sick days , now that's welfare , and they have the nerve to call my retirement entitlements !!!!!!.....scroll down...............
What the HELL's wrong???
WAKE UP AMERICA !!!!
Tuesday's Daily Bulletin paper, ran two articles on the front page side by side :
1- Calif 's 20 Billion Dollar Budget Deficit
2- The Calif Supreme Court ruling that ILLEGALS can attend college and get benefits.
Why don't they just deport them when they arrive to register?
3- Last year they ran an article on the yearly costs to Calif Taxpayers from Illegals using Hospital Emergency Rooms for their general health care -
At just one hospital the cost to tax payers totaled over 25 million a year
Someone please tell me what the HELL's wrong with all the people that run this country!!!!!!
We're "broke" & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless etc.,???????????
In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti , Chile , and Turkey . And now Pakistan ......home of bin Laden. Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!
Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed income' receive no aid nor do they get any breaks while our government and religious organizations pour Hundreds of Billions of $$$$$$'s and Tons of Food to Foreign Countries!
They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives and now when its time for us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?
We have hundreds of adoptable children who are shoved aside to make room for the adoption of foreign orphans.
AMERICA: a country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without 'needed' meds, and mentally ill without treatment -etc,etc.
YET.....................
They have a 'Benefit' for the people of Haiti on 12 TV stations, ships and planes lining up with food, water, tents clothes, bedding, doctors and medical supplies.
Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave 'US' the same support they give to other countries.
Sad isn't it?
Sunday, June 12, 2011
When Does Enough Become Too Much
One of my favorite movies is a Harrison Ford drama, "Regarding Henry", about a high-powered attorney within a high profile law firm. In a strange twist of fate, he is seriously wounded after walking into a NYC corner store during a hold-up. The part of his brain that was injured as he tried to escape was responsible for long term memory, but the neurosurgeon assured his wife that this loss could be recovered with time and patience.
Eventually, Henry thought he was well enough to resume his position at the law firm. During his review of past cases, he became confused by certain facts of his last case that were purposely withheld, causing the plaintiff to loose his case of malpractice against a hospital where he had suffered debilitating side effects as the result of negligent intake procedure. The new Henry found the fact that he argued this case purposely concealing pertinent evidence deplorable and he resigned as a partner soon after telling his secretary he'd had "Enough".
The last eight years of my life have been much like Henry's recovery after his gunshot wound. Because he lacked the memory of his past personality, Henry was faced with the necessity of reinventing himself, from the inside out. I, was also faced with the same challenge; however unlike Henry, I had to do so with the memory of my past. Eventually, I also had to say "ENOUGH"! and deal with today in healthier ways without the negative influence of past unhealthy coping and life skills.
One piece of wisdom that has guided me on this journey goes something like this: "Q. What is the definition of insanity? A. Doing the same thing the same way expecting different results." As a result, I finally came to the realization that if I was to make better choices in life that I would have to base my decisions on wisdom and not radical emotion.
As I observe the life and drama in the world around me today, I see many, many examples of this self-same INSANITY! When something, anything, does not produce positive results the mirror of honesty reveals that it's absolutely ridiculous to continue feeding into the same pattern of insanity while expecting sane and productive results.
Politically speaking, this applies to: printing money with no value to back it... Enough!; sending foreign aid to countries where the government officials pocket the funds or, even worse, use the money to support the forces we're trying to eliminate...ENOUGH! Elected officials who knowingly break laws, fraudulently subvert public funds, or "get caught" with their hand in the morality cookie jar, have broken the trust of their constituents and must suffer the consequences of their actions...not be coddled or protected by party pals. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
There are many grassroots movements in our country whose purpose is to cleanse these negative elements from our government. Beware!! They have already said "Enough is Enough!" and they're working openly and often covertly, to rid society of these evils and remove what they perceive as "undesirable" elements from national and global attitudes, actions and behaviors.
Not all of these movements, however, are in the best interest of the citizens of our country or the world. Greed, control, power, and self-interest fuel the engines of their progress and it is our responsibility to recognize those individuals and groups who would knowingly lead us down a path of destruction. When we as citizens see these forms of negative progress in the world around us, it's our responsibility make wise decisions and to say "Enough!"
It's also our responsibility as citizens of the country and the world to know when stand tall for our God-given rights and not fall for the cleverly disguised ploys of the power hungry greed-mongers who would lead us down a path of insanity with promises of hope and change that clearly have been shown to be tools of seduction. Open your eyes and your mind and you'll soon know the difference. The only people who fear the truth are those who work so hard to distort it.
Eventually, Henry thought he was well enough to resume his position at the law firm. During his review of past cases, he became confused by certain facts of his last case that were purposely withheld, causing the plaintiff to loose his case of malpractice against a hospital where he had suffered debilitating side effects as the result of negligent intake procedure. The new Henry found the fact that he argued this case purposely concealing pertinent evidence deplorable and he resigned as a partner soon after telling his secretary he'd had "Enough".
The last eight years of my life have been much like Henry's recovery after his gunshot wound. Because he lacked the memory of his past personality, Henry was faced with the necessity of reinventing himself, from the inside out. I, was also faced with the same challenge; however unlike Henry, I had to do so with the memory of my past. Eventually, I also had to say "ENOUGH"! and deal with today in healthier ways without the negative influence of past unhealthy coping and life skills.
One piece of wisdom that has guided me on this journey goes something like this: "Q. What is the definition of insanity? A. Doing the same thing the same way expecting different results." As a result, I finally came to the realization that if I was to make better choices in life that I would have to base my decisions on wisdom and not radical emotion.
As I observe the life and drama in the world around me today, I see many, many examples of this self-same INSANITY! When something, anything, does not produce positive results the mirror of honesty reveals that it's absolutely ridiculous to continue feeding into the same pattern of insanity while expecting sane and productive results.
Politically speaking, this applies to: printing money with no value to back it... Enough!; sending foreign aid to countries where the government officials pocket the funds or, even worse, use the money to support the forces we're trying to eliminate...ENOUGH! Elected officials who knowingly break laws, fraudulently subvert public funds, or "get caught" with their hand in the morality cookie jar, have broken the trust of their constituents and must suffer the consequences of their actions...not be coddled or protected by party pals. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
There are many grassroots movements in our country whose purpose is to cleanse these negative elements from our government. Beware!! They have already said "Enough is Enough!" and they're working openly and often covertly, to rid society of these evils and remove what they perceive as "undesirable" elements from national and global attitudes, actions and behaviors.
Not all of these movements, however, are in the best interest of the citizens of our country or the world. Greed, control, power, and self-interest fuel the engines of their progress and it is our responsibility to recognize those individuals and groups who would knowingly lead us down a path of destruction. When we as citizens see these forms of negative progress in the world around us, it's our responsibility make wise decisions and to say "Enough!"
It's also our responsibility as citizens of the country and the world to know when stand tall for our God-given rights and not fall for the cleverly disguised ploys of the power hungry greed-mongers who would lead us down a path of insanity with promises of hope and change that clearly have been shown to be tools of seduction. Open your eyes and your mind and you'll soon know the difference. The only people who fear the truth are those who work so hard to distort it.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
The Joshua Books
Many years ago my father introduced me to the Joshua books by Joseph F. Grizone. I was instantly intrigued by the first book of the series, simply entitled Joshua, which was described as a parable encouraging the reader to think about what it would be like if Jesus came back to live in this time in our history; what would he be like, and what would his suggestions be to promote peace, love and prosperity, both intellectually as well as spiritually.
Ten years later I decided I wanted these books to add to my own growing library so I went online in search of the books written by the retired Catholic priest. I loved his style of writing...it was simple and believable. To my surprise I found that the author had written more books with the remarkable Joshua as the central character who traveled around the United States as well as the Holy Land. The next couple of months found me ordering each of these books and savoring the messages and miracles brought about by this simple man of faith.
For this blog I would like to relate one of the solutions proposed in Grizone's book, Joshua and the City which takes place in a large metropolitan city, much like, if not, New York City. Initially, he befriends a single-parent family and helped the two teenage sons begin their own furniture upholstering business. By working with these young people he brought about great changes in a section of the city that was suffering from the same symptoms of many low-income neighborhoods. Many unaddressed and unattended to social ills were brought to light and with community spirit and pride, answers were found.
In another part of town, Joshua brings healing to a couple who had grown apart because the husband, owner of a large corporation, found more satisfaction in his work than in his marriage relationship...or so the wife believed. Slowly but quite surely, healing brought joy back to their marriage and their lives and they found great admiration for this humble man of love.
One of the suggestions I felt had great merit was taking the burden of public high schools from the state and place it in the hands of large corporations. The reasoning behind this suggestion to the corporate owner was that within the curriculum of the schools, participating corporations could find students with talents and skills in specific areas of the work force and begin educating them before graduation. This way, students would have valued jobs waiting for them upon graduation, companies would have qualified workers for necessary positions, and the responsibility of paying for public education would be shifted away from the state (and federal) government to private funding.
I value education, however, all things taken into consideration, I believe that higher education has becoming greatly over-rated. All too many graduates, young and older alike, who have invested time and money to earn higher degrees of education are out of a job and collecting unemployment, under employed, or seeking additional education to qualify for jobs now requiring a greater degree of technology, a result of our out-of-balance and out-of-touch educational requirements..
Educational systems must be able to keep up with the technology of today. Not all students are college material but feel the need to follow the present system if they want the coveted high-salaried jobs in fields of endeavor that are changing constantly as a result of the rapidly changing technology of today and tomorrow.
Yet, there is also a great need for workers. Yes, people who have talents and skills that lie outside the perimeter of the corporate world. Technology has also touched every aspect of the service industry, and service workers are still needed and must be trained, but not necessarily in a college setting and without the pressure of college curriculum and unrelated classes. And, while a well rounded education is certainly something to strive for, many people have continued their education later in life, either by taking classes of their choosing or through self-education, much of which comes with the maturity and gradual wisdom of life and the lessons of living.
I think Joshua's suggestion is something that is worth consideration in any country. Our economy needs more balance, more jobs, more job-specific options for education. So, why not begin on the level where our young people are beginning to think about their own future. Young adults that feel they have succeeded in the responsibilities of life are much more apt to feel positively about themselves and their chances of succeeding if employment promotion is their decision later in life. Wouldn't we be doing our young people a greater service in educating them for the jobs that are out there instead of requiring them to sacrifice four to eight years in higher education only to find that there are just no jobs available for the level of education, high or low, that they possess?
Ten years later I decided I wanted these books to add to my own growing library so I went online in search of the books written by the retired Catholic priest. I loved his style of writing...it was simple and believable. To my surprise I found that the author had written more books with the remarkable Joshua as the central character who traveled around the United States as well as the Holy Land. The next couple of months found me ordering each of these books and savoring the messages and miracles brought about by this simple man of faith.
For this blog I would like to relate one of the solutions proposed in Grizone's book, Joshua and the City which takes place in a large metropolitan city, much like, if not, New York City. Initially, he befriends a single-parent family and helped the two teenage sons begin their own furniture upholstering business. By working with these young people he brought about great changes in a section of the city that was suffering from the same symptoms of many low-income neighborhoods. Many unaddressed and unattended to social ills were brought to light and with community spirit and pride, answers were found.
In another part of town, Joshua brings healing to a couple who had grown apart because the husband, owner of a large corporation, found more satisfaction in his work than in his marriage relationship...or so the wife believed. Slowly but quite surely, healing brought joy back to their marriage and their lives and they found great admiration for this humble man of love.
One of the suggestions I felt had great merit was taking the burden of public high schools from the state and place it in the hands of large corporations. The reasoning behind this suggestion to the corporate owner was that within the curriculum of the schools, participating corporations could find students with talents and skills in specific areas of the work force and begin educating them before graduation. This way, students would have valued jobs waiting for them upon graduation, companies would have qualified workers for necessary positions, and the responsibility of paying for public education would be shifted away from the state (and federal) government to private funding.
I value education, however, all things taken into consideration, I believe that higher education has becoming greatly over-rated. All too many graduates, young and older alike, who have invested time and money to earn higher degrees of education are out of a job and collecting unemployment, under employed, or seeking additional education to qualify for jobs now requiring a greater degree of technology, a result of our out-of-balance and out-of-touch educational requirements..
Educational systems must be able to keep up with the technology of today. Not all students are college material but feel the need to follow the present system if they want the coveted high-salaried jobs in fields of endeavor that are changing constantly as a result of the rapidly changing technology of today and tomorrow.
Yet, there is also a great need for workers. Yes, people who have talents and skills that lie outside the perimeter of the corporate world. Technology has also touched every aspect of the service industry, and service workers are still needed and must be trained, but not necessarily in a college setting and without the pressure of college curriculum and unrelated classes. And, while a well rounded education is certainly something to strive for, many people have continued their education later in life, either by taking classes of their choosing or through self-education, much of which comes with the maturity and gradual wisdom of life and the lessons of living.
I think Joshua's suggestion is something that is worth consideration in any country. Our economy needs more balance, more jobs, more job-specific options for education. So, why not begin on the level where our young people are beginning to think about their own future. Young adults that feel they have succeeded in the responsibilities of life are much more apt to feel positively about themselves and their chances of succeeding if employment promotion is their decision later in life. Wouldn't we be doing our young people a greater service in educating them for the jobs that are out there instead of requiring them to sacrifice four to eight years in higher education only to find that there are just no jobs available for the level of education, high or low, that they possess?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)